One word to describe my reaction to both these articles
So far, I've only been reading and hearing about how great the internet has made the world. How it's connected people from across the world in ways we never would have imagined 20 years ago. How it has allowed the flow of information to reach different parts of the world in a matter of seconds.
I completely disagree with what Doris Lessing said, quoted in Nobel Laureate Says The Internet Makes Us Dumb, We Say: Meh. I think the internet has allowed those with internet capabilities to access tons of information very quickly. The internet has been a detriment in one area though, social interaction.
The face to face interaction we encounter with one another has been dwindled down to Skype/AIM/MSN. We no longer have to physically walk to someone's house or meet up for coffee if we want to "catch up". It removes the experience of human interaction and makes us socially awkward. An example of this is internet dating.
The second article I read, The Digital Emperor Has No Clothes, bashed mostly on bloggers. I don't think bloggers are trying to take away the credibility of writers for The New York Times or The Washington Post. Bloggers are trying to express an opinion or different side to the story. There are always two sides to a story and its always interesting to know both sides. Web 2.0 can allow for an amateur blogger/writer to gain merit or a credibility through other credible writers/authors/bloggers. So there is a system in place that can allow readers to realize the authenticity of an article or blogger along with the information contained within it.
That's it for this week
Stay Tuned! CHANDOO OUT!